It is an area that many players believe must be fixed, and that any sort of change would be highly problematic. The argument that the time in-game would be better off if there was an infinite amount of money on the table seems more rational.
Some players have asked for limits because it would mean that a player who has been playing longer and long before, or has a large stash of coins in his wallet when his opponent comes to play would become disadvantaged when he is eliminated early in the game. To this I say that this isn’t a consideration. The same logic applies to people who play longer without knowing they’re losing. The game should be played to a reasonable degree, as long as players don’t lose their self-respect by playing games where they have won but will likely lose again. Some people complain about tables being too long, but this is because they are trying to break the old guard monopoly and they’re scared of the potential that they were a small minority and will be outsmarted.
The truth is that casinos only want to play games with a reasonable difficulty for their players and, like any marketer, are always looking to maximize profit. If they think an increase would be detrimental, that’s probably not something they’re willing to consider. As with any market, if they think that an increase in the number of games would decrease the amount of revenue they make, they’d be right. They’re always looking to maximize profits, and it doesn’t matter if it means losing the opportunity to have a long table with the best people. It is only because they are so greedy that they’d be so concerned with how many games they have, and don’t realize the negative effects this would cause them, and their profits.
If the tables really only changed in accordance with players choosing to play longer, they’d be doing this to increase the amount of time each player can spend playing games with the people they want to. It’s not because that’s a bad thing to do. They’d be making money if they play more games, so as long as they’re playing more games, this wouldn’t be affecting them negatively. If something was happening to the players that they want or even a lack of game-play, this is a sign of a healthy market.
The casino will always be a victim in the end. They’re not trying to make the game harder, it’s because they know that there have been periods where players have been playing longer and longer without any decrease in revenue,
online roulette live casino, best online roulette system tester salary, free online roulette games no download, online american roulette simulator for free, online casino roulette for real money